Shareholders in Norway’s largest company, Statoil ASA (NYSE: STO), will approve on May 15 the board’s proposal to change its name as the company seeks to diversify its business and attract young talent concerned about fossil fuels’ impact on climate change.
From May 16, the majority state-owned company will change its 46-year-old name to Equinor and trade on the Oslo Exchange under the new ticker EQNR.
The Norwegian government, which has a 67% stake in the firm, has said it will back the move.
The oil and gas company said the name change was a natural step after it decided last year to become a “broad energy” firm, investing up to 15% to 20% of annual capex in “new energy solutions” by 2030, mostly in offshore wind.
“The key reason for a company to change its name is when it wants to widen the scope of its activity or direction. Another reason would be because it is in trouble, and it has a reputational problem,” Allyson Stewart-Allen, a London-based international branding expert and the CEO of International Marketing Partners, told Reuters. “I don’t believe that’s the case with Statoil.”
While the company’s profits are growing again, its hydrocarbon business has come under increased scrutiny after the Paris climate deal in 2016.
“A name with ‘oil’ as a component would increasingly be a disadvantage. None of our competitors has that. It served us really well for 50 years. I don’t think it will be the best name for the next 50 years,” Statoil CEO Eldar Saetre told Reuters.
The new name was meant to arouse curiosity among young people so they see the other aspects of Statoil, including renewable energy, he added.
Technology students became less interested in working for oil firms after oil prices crashed in 2014 and renewable energy gained in prominence.
Statoil ranked 15th in an annual survey of the Nordic country's most attractive employers conducted by karrierestart.no, a Norwegian careers website, and Norwegian firm Evidente, published on May 3. In 2013, it ranked first.
There are signs, however, that the name change could help it climb the ranks.
“Students who answered the survey after [news of] the name change found Statoil to be between 5% and 10% more attractive as an employer,” Arne Kvalsvik at Evidente said. “It’s likely that Statoil’s name change will have a positive impact on its reputation going forward.”
Statoil said it remained the first choice among technology students, citing another survey by Swedish firm Universum.
Truls Gulowsen, head of Greenpeace Norway, said the name change would not be sufficient to improve Statoil's image as long as the firm was exploring in vulnerable areas such as the Arctic or the Great Australian Bight.
Recommended Reading
Segrist: The LNG Pause and a Big, Dumb Question
2024-04-25 - In trying to understand the White House’s decision to pause LNG export permits and wondering if it’s just a red herring, one big, dumb question must be asked.
Texas LNG Export Plant Signs Additional Offtake Deal With EQT
2024-04-23 - Glenfarne Group LLC's proposed Texas LNG export plant in Brownsville has signed an additional tolling agreement with EQT Corp. to provide natural gas liquefaction services of an additional 1.5 mtpa over 20 years.
US Refiners to Face Tighter Heavy Spreads this Summer TPH
2024-04-22 - Tudor, Pickering, Holt and Co. (TPH) expects fairly tight heavy crude discounts in the U.S. this summer and beyond owing to lower imports of Canadian, Mexican and Venezuelan crudes.
What's Affecting Oil Prices This Week? (April 22, 2024)
2024-04-22 - Stratas Advisors predict that despite geopolitical tensions, the oil supply will not be disrupted, even with the U.S. House of Representatives inserting sanctions on Iran’s oil exports.
Association: Monthly Texas Upstream Jobs Show Most Growth in Decade
2024-04-22 - Since the COVID-19 pandemic, the oil and gas industry has added 39,500 upstream jobs in Texas, with take home pay averaging $124,000 in 2023.