Russia's private oil producers are ditching their skepticism and lining up behind an extension of a global deal to cut output after previous oil price increases compensated for lost income.
Oil prices have risen since November when OPEC reached its first deal to lower output since 2008, with some non-OPEC producers including Russia joining the move.
A decision on whether Russia backs an extension will ultimately be made in the Kremlin, and the private oil companies have limited say in the matter. But their decision to support the extension of the output cut is a tentative sign that oil price spikes have diluted some of the opposition to global production cuts.
As oil prices are still under pressure, OPEC sources told Reuters during the week of March 20 that Russia and other non-members need to remain part of the initiative to prolong the deal beyond June.
Russian state oil companies Rosneft and Gazprom Neft, along with private company Lukoil, account for the bulk of Russia's cuts. Russia had cut output by 160,000 barrels per day (Mbbl/d) by mid-March out of the targeted 300 Mbbl/d now expected by the end of April.
Vagit Alekperov, CEO of Russia's second-largest oil producer Lukoil, said during the week of March 13 that it was "expedient" to continue cuts, as the deal has already brought its first results.
Alekperov's comments represent a U-turn from last year, when he said there was no point in Russia making any deal with OPEC.
Another Russian major, Tatneft, which is controlled by the Russian region of Tatarstan, said it stood ready for output reduction.
"We are ready to cut production at the levels which lead to a financial result... but without harm to future output," the company said in emailed comments to Reuters.
Mid-sized company Russneft said that the company was ready to extend production cuts if it "serves Russian interests." "We hope the oil prices rise will offset out losses from the production cuts," Russneft said in emailed comments.
Russian Energy Minister Alexander Novak has said it was premature to decide for now if the deal should be extended, adding it would be clearer in April and May, closer to the deadline.
The energy ministry declined to comment. Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov did not reply to a Reuters request seeking a comment.
Russian state oil companies, Rosneft and Gazprom Neft, were initially reluctant to cut as both planned to increase output. Both have complied with the cut following the order from President Vladimir Putin.
Recommended Reading
Which Haynesville E&Ps Might Bid for Tellurian’s Upstream Assets?
2024-02-12 - As Haynesville E&Ps look to add scale and get ahead of growing LNG export capacity, Tellurian’s Louisiana assets are expected to fetch strong competition, according to Energy Advisors Group.
Ohio Oil, Appalachia Gas Plays Ripe for Consolidation
2024-04-09 - With buyers “starved” for top-tier natural gas assets, Appalachia could become a dealmaking hotspot in the coming years. Operators, analysts and investors are also closely watching what comes out of the ground in the Ohio Utica oil fairway.
Exclusive: Rockcliff CEO on $2.7B TGNR Deal, Value of Haynesville M&A
2024-04-10 - Rockcliff Energy CEO and President Alan Smith discusses the ups and downs of executing the transaction with TG Natural Resources and what's on the Rockcliff III radar, in this Hart Energy Exclusive interview.
An Untapped Haynesville Block: Chevron Asset Attracts High Interest
2024-04-03 - Chevron’s 72,000-net-acre property in Panola County, Texas is lightly developed for the underlying Haynesville formation — and the supermajor may cut it loose.
Aethon Cuts Rigs but Wants More Western Haynesville Acreage
2024-03-31 - Private gas E&P Aethon Energy has drilled some screamers in its far western Haynesville Shale play—and the company wants to do more in the area.