The Russia-led Nord Stream 2 consortium said on Aug. 10 it has applied to Denmark for an alternative gas pipeline route through the Baltic Sea that would avoid the Nordic state's territorial waters.
Denmark is facing a dilemma on whether the project can be built near its Baltic coast and its parliament may pass legislation allowing it to veto the Nord Stream 2 pipeline going through Danish territorial waters on security grounds.
Russia is keen to press ahead with the Nord Stream 2 pipeline since it has the potential to double its gas exports under the Baltic Sea to Germany, bypassing traditional routes through Ukraine with which it has poor relations.
The Danish government has come under fierce lobbying by Russia, EU allies and the U.S. over the $10.9 billion Nord Stream 2 project led by Gazprom and financed by five Western firms. The U.S. opposes the project while some eastern European countries fear it will make the EU a hostage to Russian gas
But Denmark does not want to act alone and has postponed a decision on the new legislation.
Its search for a united EU stance on the proposed pipeline is also deadlocked by divisions among member states over whether to do more business with Moscow despite its military incursions in Ukraine and Syria.
In July, President Donald Trump accused Germany of being a “captive” of Russia due to its energy reliance and said it was wrong to support the Baltic gas pipeline.
A Danish veto, under new legislation allowing it to do so on security grounds, would force Russia, which supplies about one third of Europe's gas needs, to find a new route for the pipeline.
“The recommendation of [Denmark’s] ministry of foreign affairs has been pending since January 2018. Therefore, Nord Stream 2 decided to explore alternative routes outside of Danish territorial waters,” the Nord Stream 2 consortium said in a statement.
The new application process will take about 12 months to complete, a spokesman for the Danish Energy Agency said.
A Nord Stream 2 spokesman said the project is progressing as planned in other countries and that it expects “no significant delay” to the pipeline.
The Danish part of the pipeline will be installed in the second half of 2019, he said. The alternative route would be 175 km long and pass north-west of the island of Bornholm.
The consortium said it was not withdrawing an application filed in April last year to build a parallel pipeline to the existing Nord Stream pipeline that is already shipping Russian natural gas to Germany.
Sweden, Finland and Germany all earlier this year issued permits for the pipeline to run through their exclusive economic zone, which is regulated by U.N. law.
Recommended Reading
Marathon Petroleum Sets 2024 Capex at $1.25 Billion
2024-01-30 - Marathon Petroleum Corp. eyes standalone capex at $1.25 billion in 2024, down 10% compared to $1.4 billion in 2023 as it focuses on cost reduction and margin enhancement projects.
Humble Midstream II, Quantum Capital Form Partnership for Infrastructure Projects
2024-01-30 - Humble Midstream II Partners and Quantum Capital Group’s partnership will promote a focus on energy transition infrastructure.
Hess Corp. Boosts Bakken Output, Drilling Ahead of Chevron Merger
2024-01-31 - Hess Corp. increased its drilling activity and output from the Bakken play of North Dakota during the fourth quarter, the E&P reported in its latest earnings.
The OGInterview: Petrie Partners a Big Deal Among Investment Banks
2024-02-01 - In this OGInterview, Hart Energy's Chris Mathews sat down with Petrie Partners—perhaps not the biggest or flashiest investment bank around, but after over two decades, the firm has been around the block more than most.
Some Payne, But Mostly Gain for H&P in Q4 2023
2024-01-31 - Helmerich & Payne’s revenue grew internationally and in North America but declined in the Gulf of Mexico compared to the previous quarter.