Royal Dutch Shell reduced its 2016 spending plans on May 4 by another 10 percent from the target set in February when it completed the acquisition of BG Group, and said it could cut further if needed.
In its first results since the deal that transformed it into the world’s top LNG producer, Shell trimmed spending to $30 billion by canceling projects such as the sour gas project in Abu Dhabi, and by slashing exploration costs.
Europe's largest oil company has been under pressure from shareholders to cut annual spending below $30 billion to ensure it can maintain its dividend given the slow recovery in the oil prices.
“Can we go further? Yes, we can,” Shell Chief Financial Officer Simon Henry, told reporters on May 4.
Having grappled with low oil prices for almost two years, capital spending, or capex, in the industry is set to fall for a second consecutive year, something that has not happened for more than three decades.
Last week, European rivals BP and Total lowered their projected 2016 capital spending programs.
Analysts welcomed Shell's spending cuts, though some investors are still hoping for deeper cuts when it announces its strategic outlook at a June 7 investor day.
Shell's shares were down 2.0 percent at 1131 GMT.
“With continued reduction of costs inside both companies in 2016 and market balancing now firmly on the horizon, the combined entity will be one of the key winners on the other side,” said Berstein analysts, who rate Shell “outperform.”
Cost Cuts
In a bid to slim down and raise cash, Shell is pressing ahead with a $30 billion asset disposal program by the end of 2018, targeting first and foremost its downstream division.
It expects to make at least $3 billion from mainly downstream disposals this year, Henry said, meaning Shell needs to step up asset sales in the coming years to meet its target.
Shell also said its annual operating expenses will fall to $40 billion this year, despite the BG acquisition, from $53 billion in 2014.
“Essentially Shell has integrated BG with no increase to its prior cost structure,” said analysts at Jefferies, who advise to buy Shell shares.
Shell, however, warned that low oil and gas prices, significant maintenance at production sites as well as “substantial redundancy and restructuring charges” will impact second-quarter earnings.
The oil producer plans to cut 10,300 jobs over the coming years and has started redundancy discussions with staff in Britain, Australia and the Netherlands.
Shell’s first earnings update with contributions from BG showed overall oil and gas output rose 16 percent in the first quarter from a year earlier. The addition of BG helped boost the amount of LNG sold by 25 percent to 12.29 million tonnes.
Shell said its definition of net income—current cost of supplies earnings excluding identified items—totaled $1.55 billion in the first quarter, topping the $1.04 billion expected by analysts.
A solid performance from its downstream division was the main reason for higher than expected earnings. It maintained its dividend unchanged at 47 cents per share.
Recommended Reading
Shell’s CEO Sawan Says Confidence in US LNG is Slipping
2024-02-05 - Issues related to Venture Global LNG’s contract commitments and U.S. President Joe Biden’s recent decision to pause approvals of new U.S. liquefaction plants have raised questions about the reliability of the American LNG sector, according to Shell CEO Wael Sawan.
Mexico Pacific Appoints New CEO Bairstow
2024-04-15 - Sarah Bairstow joined Mexico Pacific Ltd. in 2019 and is assuming the CEO role following Ivan Van der Walt’s resignation.
BP Pursues ‘25-by-‘25’ Target to Amp Up LNG Production
2024-02-15 - BP wants to boost its LNG portfolio to 25 mtpa by 2025 under a plan dubbed “25-by-25,” upping its portfolio by 9% compared to 2023, CEO Murray Auchincloss said during the company’s webcast with analysts.
BP Restructures, Reduces Executive Team to 10
2024-04-18 - BP said the organizational changes will reduce duplication and reporting line complexity.
Aramco Reports Second Highest Net Income for 2023
2024-03-15 - The year-on-year decline was due to lower crude oil prices and volumes sold and lower refining and chemicals margins.