Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper said U.S. delays in approving the Keystone XL pipeline are “not a hopeful sign” and reflect the “peculiar politics” of the Obama administration.
“A positive decision has not been rendered for a very long time, that’s obviously not a hopeful sign,” Harper said in an interview June 29 at his Ottawa office, adding he discussed the matter recently with the U.S. president. “I think there’s very peculiar politics of this particular administration.”
U.S. President Barack Obama will reject the project in August, Republican Senator John Hoeven said June 28, citing unidentified “sources.” TransCanada Corp.’s proposed $8 billion link between Alberta crude deposits and Gulf Coast refineries has been under review since 2008.
Harper said a rejection of the pipeline “is clearly possible,” when asked about Hoeven’s comments.
The White House refused to comment on the status of the Keystone review, with spokesman Eric Schultz saying the matter was being handled at the State Department.
Schultz said he hadn’t read or heard Hoeven’s statement and knew nothing about what he based the assertion on. “I’m not sure I would classify him as a confidante of the State Department.”
‘No-Brainer’
Getting the project approved has been among Harper’s highest-priority diplomatic efforts. He called the project a “no-brainer” in a 2011 interview.
A rejection of the project in the next few months could be a setback for Harper heading into Oct. 19 elections. His government’s position has consistently been that Keystone offers job creation and the displacement of oil imports from countries that can be hostile to the U.S.
Keystone has become one of the most controversial energy issues of Obama’s presidency. He has questioned its benefits to the U.S. and vetoed a Republican-backed bill that would have bypassed a State Department review and allowed construction.
“The fact a decision has not been rendered for so long, even after all the objective analyses said that the project is better from an economic standpoint, an energy standpoint, even an environmental standpoint -- it’s certainly preferable to rail -- even after all those things, a decision hasn’t been rendered,” Harper said. “I believe that whether this project goes ahead or not under this administration, it will ultimately go ahead under a subsequent administration.”
Recommended Reading
EQT Sees Clear Path to $5B in Potential Divestments
2024-04-24 - EQT Corp. executives said that an April deal with Equinor has been a catalyst for talks with potential buyers as the company looks to shed debt for its Equitrans Midstream acquisition.
Matador Hoards Dry Powder for Potential M&A, Adds Delaware Acreage
2024-04-24 - Delaware-focused E&P Matador Resources is growing oil production, expanding midstream capacity, keeping debt low and hunting for M&A opportunities.
TotalEnergies, Vanguard Renewables Form RNG JV in US
2024-04-24 - Total Energies and Vanguard Renewable’s equally owned joint venture initially aims to advance 10 RNG projects into construction during the next 12 months.
Ithaca Energy to Buy Eni's UK Assets in $938MM North Sea Deal
2024-04-23 - Eni, one of Italy's biggest energy companies, will transfer its U.K. business in exchange for 38.5% of Ithaca's share capital, while the existing Ithaca Energy shareholders will own the remaining 61.5% of the combined group.
EIG’s MidOcean Closes Purchase of 20% Stake in Peru LNG
2024-04-23 - MidOcean Energy’s deal for SK Earthon’s Peru LNG follows a March deal to purchase Tokyo Gas’ LNG interests in Australia.