At least $247 billion of capital will be needed to develop the new Wolfcamp-shale play—and just on 320s and in just two of the four zones.
“Is it too late to enter the Permian. I’d say that’s crazy,” says Mike Wichterich, co-founder and president of Permian-focused Three Rivers Operating Co. II LLC. “There are 57 private-equity-backed companies in the Permian. There are 57 sellers that are already into it two or three years. In the next two to three years, every one of these guys will sell.”
Wichterich presented recently to members of ADAM-Houston, an organization of oil and gas mergers and acquisitions professionals.
“And there are 200-plus mom and pops in the basin who can’t afford $8.5-million wells, $7-million wells, $6-million wells. They can’t afford a $4-million well in the Permian.
“Then you have seven public companies that are small caps. They can’t last. There will be massive consolidation. There is going to be a ton of consolidation here in the next three to four months. I will make the prediction: In three to four months, you’re going to see some major players come back into the market.”
Wichterich and his partners previously co-founded Riverstone Holdings LLC-backed, Permian-focused Three Rivers I, which was sold in 2012 for $1 billion to Concho Resources Inc. The divestment was within two years of Three Rivers’ first Permian acquisition, which was from Chesapeake Energy Corp. That and a second acquisition—from Samson Resources Co.—gave it 700 operated and 800 nonoperated Permian wells. With a new round of Riverstone backing, Three Rivers has amassed another Permian portfolio.
Further driving the consolidation will be that at least $247 billion of capital will be needed to develop the new Wolfcamp-shale play, he says.
“Let’s say you have two (Wolfcamp) zones that work on 320-acre spacing. That turns into $247 billion of development cost. All of the Permian companies combined don’t have that kind of money—in cash. They cannot afford it. And that’s for just two zones. We’re talking about three zones and four zones (of potential Wolfcamp pay).”
Basin acreage-holders may, rather than just selling, opt to do joint ventures or take nonoperated positions, he adds. “This basin is a capital machine and it looks like it’s going to be this way for a while.”
–Nissa Darbonne, Author, The American Shales; Editor-at-Large, Oil and Gas Investor, OilandGasInvestor.com, Oil and Gas Investor This Week, A&D Watch, A-Dcenter.com, UGcenter.com. Contact Nissa at ndarbonne@hartenergy.com.
Recommended Reading
Which Haynesville E&Ps Might Bid for Tellurian’s Upstream Assets?
2024-02-12 - As Haynesville E&Ps look to add scale and get ahead of growing LNG export capacity, Tellurian’s Louisiana assets are expected to fetch strong competition, according to Energy Advisors Group.
Is Grayson Mill the Next Bakken Domino to Fall After Chevron-Hess?
2024-01-31 - As E&Ps look to bulk up outside of the Permian Basin, EnCap-backed Bakken player Grayson Mill Energy is reportedly exploring a sale valued around $5 billion.
EQT Ups Stake in Appalachia Gas Gathering Assets for $205MM
2024-02-14 - EQT Corp. inked upstream and midstream M&A in the fourth quarter—and the Appalachia gas giant is looking to ink more deals this year.
Global Partners Buys Four Liquid Energy Terminals from Gulf Oil
2024-04-10 - Global Partners initially set out to buy five terminals from Gulf Oil but the purchase of a terminal in Portland was abandoned after antitrust concerns were raised by the FTC and the Maine attorney general.
Ohio Oil, Appalachia Gas Plays Ripe for Consolidation
2024-04-09 - With buyers “starved” for top-tier natural gas assets, Appalachia could become a dealmaking hotspot in the coming years. Operators, analysts and investors are also closely watching what comes out of the ground in the Ohio Utica oil fairway.